Not long after I posted my view on things, John posted his reply on the ChemSpider/OpenData discussion. His comment was merely to illustrate an internal advice to some organization, which got accidentally leaked. Anyway, a must read, with two good links to further reading on open data licensing.
His blog mentions the concept of public domain, where data might be dumped, but I always understood that the US public domain concept is different from that of mainland-EU, German law in particular. This second 'good link' points to a license which formalizes this 'public domain' idea. And reading it, I realize that I have read it before. But I had completely forgot about it.
A quick reread of these two links, tells me that it indeed is BSD-versus-GPL all over again; with the Science Commons license on the BSD side, and CC-BY-SA at the GPL side. The first surely makes the life easier of aggregators who wish to combine licenses. Can't argue with that.
Then again... what's wrong with a bit of viral character in the license? What's wrong with the statement that 'you may use my data, if I may use your aggregated data with the same license'? That limits your what you practically can do, but does not limit your freedoms.
Labels
CDK (95) chemistry (54) Bioclipse (52) chemoinformatics (46) RDF (29) InChI (24) metabolomics (19) JChemPaint (18) blogging (18) publishing (18) QSAR (17) cheminformatics (17) Java (16) Jmol (16) Blue Obelisk (15) Chemical blogspace (15) open data (15) CML (14) bioinformatics (14) pubchem (14) semantic web (14) ACS (11) Taverna (11) NMR (10) google (10) ODOSOS (9) SMILES (9) literature (9) ChemSpider (8) Eclipse (8) RDFa (8) SPARQL (8) Wikipedia (8) XMPP (8) cdkws2009 (8) chemometrics (8) conference (8) descriptors (8) git (8) science (8) MetWare (7) database (7) firefox (7) microformats (7) nature (7) opensource (7) workshop (7) Chicago (6) R (6) SourceForge (6) Ubuntu (6) greasemonkey (6) io-data (6) unit testing (6) FOAF (5) JOELib (5) JSF (5) JUnit (5) KDE (5) RSS (5) SENECA (5) Strigi (5) atom types (5) creative commons (5) crystallography (5) development (5) editor (5) friendfeed (5) javascript (5) license (5) mass spectroscopy (5) molecular (5) molecules (5) open source (5) CMLRSS (4) Debian (4) HTML (4) KEGG (4) KNIME (4) NMRShiftDB (4) Open Notebook Science (4) PhD (4) Postgenomic.com (4) RSC (4) SWT (4) Slashdot (4) Uppsala (4) XML (4) XML Schema (4) blogspace (4) connotea (4) ontologies (4) peer review (4) reaction (4) sechemtic (4) text mining (4) web2.0 (4) webservices (4)Saturday, May 10, 2008
John Wilbanks replies to the ChemSpider/OpenData discussion
License: Creative Commons 2.5 - Attribution ![]()
Posted by
Egon Willighagen
at
Saturday, May 10, 2008
Tags: creative commons, license, open data, science commons
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


0 peer reviews:
Post a Comment