tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17889588.post898037681589924193..comments2024-03-13T07:14:55.283+01:00Comments on chem-bla-ics: Lunch at Nature HQ (with Euan, Joanna, Ian and Ålf)Egon Willighagenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07470952136305035540noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17889588.post-38999843288315513702007-10-17T08:58:00.000+02:002007-10-17T08:58:00.000+02:00Looking forward to both your review and the real r...Looking forward to both your review and the real review (which, as far as I can tell based on the deadline they gave me for reviewing other papers for that edition, is more than 2 weeks late). Perhaps you are actually an official reviewer and they will be the same :)!<BR/><BR/>I was thinking in the HTML version. - I would guess it would be much easier. I'd personally like to move away from the PDF for repesentation of online content if possible. Unless you are Adobe.. they are pain in the but to work with inside.<BR/><BR/>Yes, like ProjectProspect. I need to read about that.. Is there any way that public taggers a la Connoteaites could add in-document tags ?<BR/><BR/>Regarding E.D. Right now, E.D. works with vocabularies that follow the representational structure in the <A HREF="http://www.berkeleybop.org/ontologies/" REL="nofollow">OBO pre-alpha OWL versions</A>. That is, it expects the semantic tags to correspond to OWL classes. It does not yet offer the capability to assign typed properties such as those in your RDF document, only adding the 'hasSemanticTag' relation to the currently implicit hasTag relation.<BR/><BR/>I want to leave it that way for the next month or so - depending on what happens with the reviews.. But am eager to a) make it work for larger vocabs and b) add typed predicates. For immediate use however, any tag you want in there will have to be an OWL class.Benjamin Goodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11241205744976358428noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17889588.post-61054626620190279552007-10-17T08:05:00.000+02:002007-10-17T08:05:00.000+02:00Hi Benjamin!I have had your manuscript in my bag f...Hi Benjamin!<BR/><BR/>I have had your manuscript in my bag for at least two weeks now, but haven't found time to write up my comments yet! Sorry about that! It's almost like a true reviewing process :)<BR/><BR/>re 1) you mean annotation in the PDF or HTML? To mark up chemical compounds there? Like with RSC's Project Prospect?<BR/><BR/>re 2) yes, let's synchronize that. I have set up RDF statements regarding those things for Strigi, see:<BR/><BR/>http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/strigi/src/streamanalyzer/fieldproperties/chemical.rdfs?view=markup<BR/><BR/>Is that what you mean?Egon Willighagenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07470952136305035540noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17889588.post-33319209088354464722007-10-17T04:42:00.000+02:002007-10-17T04:42:00.000+02:00Wow, lucky man! I would have loved to be at that ...Wow, lucky man! I would have loved to be at that lunch. I'm curious to hear how they reacted to your suggestions?<BR/><BR/>2 questions <BR/>- any suggestion how to annotate the specific String within the document that refers to the chemical (or other) entity? Seems that NPG could easily facilitate that. if they wanted to.<BR/><BR/>- want to set up <A HREF="http://i9606.blogspot.com/2007/09/draft-of-ed-manuscript-number-1.html" REL="nofollow">E.D.</A> with the specific set of tags you are after (e.g. InChi ids)? Anything that you can get into an OWL document and post somewhere online can be added very easily and I'd love to do it. (We need more controlled tag sets in there).Benjamin Goodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11241205744976358428noreply@blogger.com