I won't dwell about open citations and CiTO, but do want to repeat how humongous potential Wikidata (Wikibase) has. Yesterday, during the SWAT4HCLS hackathon we ran into a predicate allowing Wikidata to store and generally FAIR-ify "Acknowledgment" sections. You can actually record whom you are thanking in your article, with the caveat, the people need to be in Wikidata (notable). Property P7173 is used for this. 

This query lists people who have been acknowledged in Wikidata this way, for whatever the literature thanks them for. It's a bit of recognition and rewarding, some real impact on the scientific process that no one care about (as much as citations). You get thanked a lot in articles? Currently, you should have gotten yourself cited instead. Perverse incentives, indeed.

My last blog was already two months ago. The reason for this was the log4j security risk. Since much of our software actually is written in Java, the question was indeed if the CDK (doi:10.1186/s13321-017-0220-4), BridgeDb (doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-5), Bacting (doi:10.21105/joss.02558), etc were affected. 

Basically, the toolkit is that old, that everyone jumped on in: it was just good. Now, practically, the problems were minor.
Text
Text
This blog deals with chemblaics in the broader sense. Chemblaics (pronounced chem-bla-ics) is the science that uses computers to solve problems in chemistry, biochemistry and related fields. The big difference between chemblaics and areas such as chem(o)?informatics, chemometrics, computational chemistry, etc, is that chemblaics only uses open source software, open data, and open standards, making experimental results reproducible and validatable. And this is a big difference!
About Me
About Me
Popular Posts
Popular Posts
Pageviews past week
Pageviews past week
1831
Blog Archive
Blog Archive
Labels
Labels
Loading
Dynamic Views theme. Powered by Blogger. Report Abuse.