![]() |
| Screenshot of the Open Science History group on CiteULike. |
Slowly this is changing, but only slowly. What this really needs, is open licenses, just like open source licenses. Licenses that allow fixing typos, allow resharing with your students, etc.
But contrary to what has been prevalent in the Plan S discussion, these ideas are not new. And people have been trying Open Science for more than two decades already.
I have been trying to dig up the oldest references (ongoing effort) of the term Open Science (in the current meaning), and had a CiteULike group for that. But CiteULike is shutting down, so I will blog the references I found, and add some context.
A first article to mention is this 1998 article that mentions Open Science: Common Agency Contracting and the Emergence of "Open Science" Institutions The American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 2. (May 1998), pp. 15-21 by Paul A. David. Worth reading, but does require reading some of the cited literature.
The follow two magazine articles took the term Open Science to a wider public, and in reply to a conference held at Brookhaven National Laboratory:
- The 'Open-Source Movement' Turns Its Eye to Science The Chronicle of Higher Education (5 November 1999) by Vincent Kiernan
- A Natural Home for Open Source 1999 Dr. Dobb's The World of Software Development (1 October 1999)
- Open Source/Open Science 1999 Linux Journal (1 February 2000) by Stephen Adler
I would also like to note that the openscience.org website by Dan Gezelter went online in the late nineties already, which I have used in various of my source code projects, and, of course, also has been used by the Chemistry Development Kit from the start.

No comments:
Post a Comment